When it comes to hurting our economy exactly who is worse, International Terrorists of Large Unions? The reason I ask is simple, you see we are in a Presidential Election year, with less than 100-days to go, and the two mandates are talking about outsourcing American Jobs and debating why companies are leaving the US and seeking less hostile business environments ; lower corporate taxes, few class action lawsuits, simpler regulations, and less grief from unions. Okay so let's talk about who is really hurting our economy shall we?
There was an interesting article that appeared in News and World Report on September 7, 2015 titled: "With contract expiration nearing, UAW chief says he has not picked an auto company to target," by Tom Krisher, Associated Press Auto Writer – which stated:
"… UAW President Dennis Williams said Monday he'll pick between Ford, General Motors and Fiat Chrysler," and "Speaking after Detroit's annual Labor Day parade, Williams would not address either the contracts would be extended and save no details about how the talks that cover about 140,000 workers are progressing; 'Everybody says to me' Dennis, have you picked a target? ' Yes General Motors, Ford and Chrysler, 'Williams said to applause during a post-paragraph speech. But after he told reporters that he would choose a single company by the time the current four-year contracts end. "
At the time of that article about one-year ago – The UAW (United Auto Workers) president stated he has not decided, or THEY have not decided which car company to TARGET yet. WOW, any other sector in our economy and they'd face a Federal Indictment for conspiring in this way. I am pissed off with the double-standards we have in this Great Nation. It's pathetic to allow the UAW to do this. Totally pathetic, Ayn Rand was right. Is this really about collective bargaining or is this about collective terrorism.
And, what happens if companies do not acquiesce? Simple, the union members will act like thugs, vandalize cars of "scabs" those workers who cross the picket lines, and harassment management, part time workers and lobby to get government to come in and over regulate and fine the companies into exhaustion until they give up and pay up. Wow, so what is the definition of terrorism again?
"The use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims."
Yep, that's the definition and it sure fits these actions does not it? So, if the democrats sponsor big labor unions, does that mean they are sponsoring terrorism? Well? Does it?